nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo journalinfonormal searchdiv searchzone qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
2025, 05, v.43 24-35
后置动力系统流场对机翼升力气动特性影响的试验研究
基金项目(Foundation): 江西省飞行器设计与气动仿真重点实验室项目资助(EI202206269)
邮箱(Email):
DOI: 10.19327/j.cnki.zuaxb.1007-9734.2025.05.004
摘要:

研究将动力系统安置机翼后缘情况下,动力系统所形成的流场对飞机机翼气动特性产生的影响。通过一系列风洞试验,对机翼在动力流场干扰下的气动特性进行测定,即在机翼襟翼放下角度、机翼迎角变化时,对机翼的升力、阻力、俯仰力矩进行测定,进而分析总结后置动力系统对机翼气动特性和增升效果的影响规律。研究结果表明:后置动力系统能够延缓动力前方机翼表面气流分离,稳定机翼表面气流流动;当雷诺数Re=3.24×105且有后置动力系统时,机翼气动性能更为优越;飞机机翼的失速迎角提升至16°时,升力系数增大,最大增长率为6.02%,同时多缝襟翼的气动特性和增升效果普遍提升;当迎角为6°时,升阻比较为稳定,最大提升率为5.73%。

Abstract:

In order to explore the influence of the flow field generated by an aft-mounted propulsion system on the aerodynamic characteristics of aircraft wings, a series of wind tunnel tests are carried out to measure the aerodynamic characteristics of the wing under the interference of the dynamic flow field. Specifically, the lift, drag and pitching moment of the wing are measured under varying flap deflection angles and angles of attack, thereby analyzing the influence patterns of the aft-mounted propulsion system on the aerodynamic characteristics and lift-enhancement effects of the wing. Results show that the use of the aft-mounted propulsion system can delay the separation of airflow on the upper surface of the wing in front of the system and stabilize the surface airflow flow. At a Reynolds number of 3.24×105, the wing exhibits improved aerodynamic performance with the aft-mounted propulsion system: the stall angle of attack increases to 16°, and the lift coefficient rises with a maximum growth rate of 6.02%. The aerodynamic characteristics and lifting effect of the multi-element airfoil are also generally improved. The lift drag ratio is relatively stable when the angle of attack is 6°, with the maximum lift rate of 5.73%.

参考文献

[1]王爽,王开通,曹金华,等.国外高速直升机的现状与发展趋势分析[J].航空科学技术,2023,34(12):1-8.

[2]黄明其,徐栋霞,何龙,等.常规旋翼构型复合式高速直升机发展概况及关键技术[J].航空动力学报,2021,36(6):1156-1168.

[3]刘星亮.面向复合式高速直升机总体设计的飞行力学及气动分析[D].南京:南京航空航天大学,2022.

[4]孙崇,赵维涛.后置螺旋桨与双尾撑无人机气动干扰分析[J].兵器装备工程学报,2021,42(6):118-122.

[5]GE M W,ZHANG H,WU Y,et al.Effects of leading edge defects on aerodynamic performance of the S809 airfoil[J].Energy Conversion and Management,2019,195:466-479.

[6]李润杰,祖红亚,李春,等.襟翼翼缝相对宽度对翼型动态气动性能的影响[J].热能动力工程,2016,31(4):38-44.

[7]祖红亚,李春,李润杰,等.襟翼相对长度对翼型气动性能的影响[J].动力工程学报,2015,35(8):666-673.

[8]李嘉仪,黄再兴,张宪政,等.变弯度柔性机翼与多段翼型气动特性对比研究[J].航空科学技术,2022,33(12):54-61.

[9]饶崇,张铁军,魏闯,等.一种分布式电动飞机螺旋桨滑流影响机理[J].航空学报,2021,42(S1):157-167.

[10]吴浩,石永康,赵越,等.螺旋桨滑流对机翼特性的影响研究[J].机床与液压,2024,52(14):1-6.

[11]吕继航,谷伟岩,温庆,等.背负式单发螺旋桨飞机滑流效应影响研究[J].飞行力学,2014,32(5):468-471.

[12]乔宇航,马东立,李陟.螺旋桨/机翼相互干扰的非定常数值模拟[J].航空动力学报,2015,30(6):1366-1373.

[13]陈广强,白鹏,詹慧玲,等.一种推进式螺旋桨无人机滑流效应影响研究[J].空气动力学学报,2015,33(4):554-562.

[14]WANG H B,GAN W B,LI D C.An investigation of the aerodynamic performance for a propeller-aided lift-enhancing double wing configuration[J].Aerospace Science and Technology,2020,105:105991.

[15]WESTCOTT O,KRISHNA S,ENTWISTLE R,et al.Aerodynamic performance of aircraft wings with stationary vertical lift propellers[J].Aerospace Science and Technology,2023,141:108552

[16]曲昭兴,刘业宝,司亮,等.螺旋桨滑流对无人机气动特性影响研究[C]//中国航天电子技术研究院科学技术委员会.中国航天电子技术研究院科学技术委员会2020年学术年会论文集.北京:中国航天电子技术研究院科学技术委员会,2020:545-554.

[17]林畅,赵熹,杨宇,等.小型巡飞弹螺旋桨布局气动特性研究[J].机械设计与制造工程,2024,53(2):73-78.

[18]李嘉仪,黄再兴,张宪政,等.变弯度柔性机翼与多段翼型气动特性对比研究[J].航空科学技术,2022,33(12):54-61.

[19]孔凡,蔡锦阳.缝道闭合门对多段翼型气动特性的影响研究[J].计算机仿真,2023,40(2):24-27,107.

基本信息:

DOI:10.19327/j.cnki.zuaxb.1007-9734.2025.05.004

中图分类号:V211.41

引用信息:

[1]刘滢,江善元,李孟金,等.后置动力系统流场对机翼升力气动特性影响的试验研究[J].郑州航空工业管理学院学报,2025,43(05):24-35.DOI:10.19327/j.cnki.zuaxb.1007-9734.2025.05.004.

基金信息:

江西省飞行器设计与气动仿真重点实验室项目资助(EI202206269)

检 索 高级检索

引用

GB/T 7714-2015 格式引文
MLA格式引文
APA格式引文